Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an exempted industrial unit, whose period of exemption had not expired and the exemption limit had not been exhausted, could be compelled to deposit the assessed sales tax before its appeals were entertained.
Analysis: The record showed that the petitioner was granted exemption from sales tax and purchase tax under the relevant exemption rules and that the exemption period was still subsisting. In that situation, the assessed demand itself could not be treated as immediately recoverable for the purpose of insisting upon a pre-deposit as a condition for hearing the appeals. The authorities below failed to notice the admitted exemption status and proceeded to insist on deposit of the assessed amount, including partial deposit before the Tribunal, despite the petitioner's entitlement to exemption.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was unsustainable and the petitioner's appeals had to be entertained without payment of any tax.
Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the appellate authority was directed to hear and decide the assessee's appeals on merits without insisting on tax deposit.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessee covered by a subsisting tax exemption cannot be compelled to make a pre-deposit of the assessed tax as a condition for maintaining its statutory appeal.