2013 (11) TMI 1141

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....da, AR ORDER Per Sahab Singh : These stay applications have been filed by M/s Goyal Auto Products Pvt. Ltd., Shri Rahubir Dayal Goyal and Rahul Goyal, against imposition of penalties on them which were confirmed by Commissioner (Appeal) in the impugned order. 2. Brief facts of the case are that appellants are engaged in the manufacturing of Aluminium Die Casting Parts for Automobiles w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xcise Rules. Semi-finished goods valued at Rs. 15,67,196 were also detained on 23.03.2010 and seized on 20.08.2010. Thereafter a Show Cause Notice was issued to the appellants which was adjudicated by the Adjudicating Authority who confiscated the seized goods and gave option to the appellant to redeem the same on payment of redemption fine of Rs. 3,00,000/- Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 6,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was given. The Commissioner (Appeal) did not reduce the penalty in respect of Shri Rahul Goyal and Shri Raghubir Dayal Goyal and penalty of Rs. 75,000/- was imposed on the main appellant M/s Goyal Auto Products. 4. M/s Goyal Auto Product Pvt. Ltd. and other two appellants have requested waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of Rs. 75,000/- penalty on M/s Goyal Auto Product and R....