<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1141 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal considered whether the appellants needed to make a further pre-deposit before their penalty appeals could be heard. It found that the amount already deposited against the admitted central excise duty liability was sufficient for hearing the appeals, so no additional pre-deposit was required in relation to the penalties under challenge. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted, and recovery of the penalties was stayed until disposal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:24:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=336816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1141 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal considered whether the appellants needed to make a further pre-deposit before their penalty appeals could be heard. It found that the amount already deposited against the admitted central excise duty liability was sufficient for hearing the appeals, so no additional pre-deposit was required in relation to the penalties under challenge. Waiver of pre-deposit was therefore granted, and recovery of the penalties was stayed until disposal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=239964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>