1994 (8) TMI 292

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ms of rule of court the present petition is being disposed of finally at the stage of admission. 2.. The petitioner seeks quashing of order dated June 16, 1993 (annexure 11 to the writ petition) passed by the Divisional Level Committee, the respondent No. 2; for quashing the earlier order dated July 8, 1991 (annexure 5 to the writ petition), which rejects the claim of the petitioner for grant o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lication of the petitioner after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner on the additional objection raised at the time of review. The petitioner thereafter filed the said order before the said respondent and the impugned order has been passed on June 16, 1993 (annexure 11 to the writ petition), again rejecting the review application of the petitioner. The contention raised is that in s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tioner would have placed the relevant notification and the amendment on which the said authority did not apply its mind. It is not necessary for this Court to go into various grounds raised by the petitioner including the said amendment as we feel that the impugned order is not sustainable on the sole ground that the respondent No. 2 in spite of order issued by this Court on March 12, 1993 did not....