https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159313 The authority had to comply with the Court's prior direction to afford the petitioner a personal hearing before deciding the review application and the exemption claim under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. Because the record showed that no such hearing was given, the rejection order was inconsistent with the mandatory procedural direction and could not be sustained. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. en-us Tue, 30 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:16:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159313 The authority had to comply with the Court's prior direction to afford the petitioner a personal hearing before deciding the review application and the exemption claim under the U.P. Sales Tax Act. Because the record showed that no such hearing was given, the rejection order was inconsistent with the mandatory procedural direction and could not be sustained. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 30 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=159313