2008 (10) TMI 599
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Parekh, Adv., Mr. Jitin Sahni, Adv., Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Adv., M/s. M. Saxena, Adv. and Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhan, Adv., Mrs. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv., Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. and Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv. ORDER Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. No costs. ORDER 1) Leave granted. 2) The appellan....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....09.1997" and "the order of adverse remarks dated 09.06.1998" for the period 01.04.1997 to 13.10.1997 while considering the appellant for promotion. In the light of the said order, the appellant contended that these two adverse entries should not have been considered by the D.P.C. He further contended that throughout the period he was given entry of "good". The respondent-Department alleged that th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Bench passed an order recommending the authority not to rely on the order of caution dated 22.09.1997 and the order of adverse remarks dated 09.06.1998. In view of the said order, one obstacle relating to his promotion goes. Coming to the second aspect, that though the benchmark "very good" is required for being considered for promotion admittedly the entry of "good" was not communicated to the ap....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... has no case that the appellant had ever been informed of the nature of the grading given to him. 5) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has pointed out that the officer who was immediately junior in service to the appellant was given promotion on 28.08.2000. Therefore, the appellant also be deemed to have been given promotion from 28.08.2000. Since the appellant had retired from servic....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI