2008 (10) TMI 599

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....., Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Adv., M/s. M. Saxena, Adv. and Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhan, Adv., Mrs. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani, Adv., Mr. B.K. Prasad, Adv. and Mr. V.K. Verma,Adv. ORDER Leave granted. The appeal is allowed in terms of the signed order. No costs. ORDER 1) Leave granted. 2) The appellant was Post Master General during the relevant perio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....06.1998" for the period 01.04.1997 to 13.10.1997 while considering the appellant for promotion. In the light of the said order, the appellant contended that these two adverse entries should not have been considered by the D.P.C. He further contended that throughout the period he was given entry of "good". The respondent-Department alleged that the appellant was not considered for promotion as he ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... rely on the order of caution dated 22.09.1997 and the order of adverse remarks dated 09.06.1998. In view of the said order, one obstacle relating to his promotion goes. Coming to the second aspect, that though the benchmark "very good" is required for being considered for promotion admittedly the entry of "good" was not communicated to the appellant. The entry of 'good' should have been communica....