https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158845 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of fair assessment and communication of ACR entries in promotion decisions, ensuring that civil servants are not unfairly disadvantaged in their career progression. The appellant, a Post Master General, challenged the decision of the Departmental Promotion Committee (D.P.C.) regarding his eligibility for promotion based on adverse entries in his ACR. The Court held that non-communication of adverse entries affecting promotion prospects is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The appellant was subsequently promoted and granted retrospective promotion and benefits, with recalculated pension and retirement benefits based on the promotion date. en-us Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158845 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of fair assessment and communication of ACR entries in promotion decisions, ensuring that civil servants are not unfairly disadvantaged in their career progression. The appellant, a Post Master General, challenged the decision of the Departmental Promotion Committee (D.P.C.) regarding his eligibility for promotion based on adverse entries in his ACR. The Court held that non-communication of adverse entries affecting promotion prospects is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The appellant was subsequently promoted and granted retrospective promotion and benefits, with recalculated pension and retirement benefits based on the promotion date. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158845