Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (8) TMI 819

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt : Mr. K. Balasubramaniam Special Government Pleader For the Respondent : No appearance ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M. Duraiswamy) The above revision case arises against the order in M.T.A.No.234 of 1993, dated 18.01.2002, on the file of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, (Additional Bench), Madurai. 2. The Appeal in M.T.A.No.234 of 1993 was filed against the o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g Officer also levied penalty under Section 12(3) of the Act. Aggrieved over the orders of the Assessing Officer, the appellants filed appeal before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirunelveli who modified the order of the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved over the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT), Tirunelveli, the appellants filed second appeal before the Sales Tax Appella....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oconut oil for the copra crushed at the first instant and for the second instant they have adopted 50% ratio. Therefore, inspecting officials took an inconsistent view while adopting the output of coconut oil for the copra crushed. 7. The Tribunal while taking into consideration the contentions raised by the appellants found that the inspecting officials have not adduced convincing reason for a....