<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 819 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158666</link>
    <description>Where estimation of coconut oil output from copra crushed was disputed, inconsistent ratios adopted by officials for the same commodity without convincing justification were treated as unreliable. The Tribunal made a reasoned fair estimate of 50% on the material before it and correspondingly modified the penalty, finding no specific or deliberate omission to justify restoring the original assessment. The revisional court declined interference because the Tribunal had exercised its discretion judiciously and no perversity or legal error was shown. The modified assessment and penalty were therefore confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=334439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 819 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158666</link>
      <description>Where estimation of coconut oil output from copra crushed was disputed, inconsistent ratios adopted by officials for the same commodity without convincing justification were treated as unreliable. The Tribunal made a reasoned fair estimate of 50% on the material before it and correspondingly modified the penalty, finding no specific or deliberate omission to justify restoring the original assessment. The revisional court declined interference because the Tribunal had exercised its discretion judiciously and no perversity or legal error was shown. The modified assessment and penalty were therefore confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=158666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>