2013 (10) TMI 941
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Appellant: Ms. Karthika Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri P. Arul, Superintendent (AR) JUDGEMENT Per Mathew John 1. After hearing both sides for some time, it was found that this issue has already been decided by the Tribunal and therefore after waiving the requirement of pre-deposit of dues arising from the impugned order, appeal itself was taken up for disposal. 2. App....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ntesting the credit reversal already made. Appellant is contesting penalty as per the appeal papers but they are also contesting interest in terms of the submissions orally made during hearing. 3. She submits that the question whether any reversal of credit is required on account of the waste products has already been decided in the case of Manakpur Chini Mills Vs CCE Allahabad - 2012 (284) ELT....


TaxTMI