https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238486 The Tribunal held that the appellant, a sugar manufacturer, was not required to reverse Cenvat credit on waste products generated during manufacturing. The interest and penalty imposed were deemed unjustified as the duty demand was not legally sustainable. Therefore, the appellant was not obligated to pay the interest demanded in cash or sustain the penalty. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, clarifying the application of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and emphasizing the necessity of a legally sustainable duty demand to justify interest and penalties. en-us Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238486 The Tribunal held that the appellant, a sugar manufacturer, was not required to reverse Cenvat credit on waste products generated during manufacturing. The interest and penalty imposed were deemed unjustified as the duty demand was not legally sustainable. Therefore, the appellant was not obligated to pay the interest demanded in cash or sustain the penalty. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, clarifying the application of Rule 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and emphasizing the necessity of a legally sustainable duty demand to justify interest and penalties. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=238486