2013 (8) TMI 657

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce of the appellant notice for 6.5.2013 was issued. Accordingly matter was adjourned to 3.6.2013. On 3.6.2013, matter was adjourned to 5.8.2013 as last opportunity for hearing. 2. Today, the appellant not being present and Revenues interest being affected by adjournments as above, it is considered proper to dispose the stay applications on their own merit. 3. Ld. DR submits that the goods imported were Plazma T.V., etc. and those were under-valued. When the appellants raised ground of violation of natural justice, in the first round of litigation, Tribunal considering their grievance by an order dated 23.5.2011 remanded the appeal directing the appellant to obtain requisite relied upon documents at their expenses within a period of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r in different paras of his order with following consequences:-          27. Goods valued at Rs.47,83,064/- (Rupees Forty Seven Thousand eighty three thousand sixty four only) seized on 12.1.2005 were under Section 111(d) and Section 111(m) read with Section 118 of the Customs Ac, 1962 with an option to the party to redeem the same within 30 days after paying Rs.20 Lakhs (Rupees Twenty lakhs only) as redemption fine under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962. In view of Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, customs duty amounting to Rs.9,99,513/- (Rupees Nine lakhs ninety nine thousand five hundred and thirteen only) was required to be paid by the party in addition to the redemption fine at the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sys, earlier situated at Near Amar Singh College, Wazir Bagh, Srinagar, J&K, new address N-61, Greater Kailash-I, Windsor Mansion (Basement) New Delhi-110 048 under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. 6. When the record shows oblique motive of appellant and overseas enquiry went against them careless attitude of the appellant remaining silent to pursue stay applications calls for dismissal. Appellants not being vigilant to pursue remedy before the Tribunal even in second round of litigation, interest of Revenue has been seriously prejudiced which also compels to dismiss their stay applications. We order accordingly. 7. All the three applicants are directed to deposit entire demand raised by adjudication order within 60 days of the r....