<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 657 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal proceeded with stay applications in the appellant&#039;s absence due to multiple adjournments, leading to dismissal of the applications. Allegations of under-valuation of imported goods, collusion between parties, and violation of natural justice were confirmed, resulting in penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal directed all applicants to deposit the demanded amounts within 60 days to uphold Revenue&#039;s interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198772" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 657 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal proceeded with stay applications in the appellant&#039;s absence due to multiple adjournments, leading to dismissal of the applications. Allegations of under-valuation of imported goods, collusion between parties, and violation of natural justice were confirmed, resulting in penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal directed all applicants to deposit the demanded amounts within 60 days to uphold Revenue&#039;s interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>