Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (8) TMI 462

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent : Shri Sanjay Jain, DR. Per: Sahab Singh: These applications have been filed by M/s Rathi Udyog Ltd (herein after referred to as RUL) seeking waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of duty amounting to Rs. 58,15,019/- with equal amount of penalty imposed on them by the Commissioner. Other appellants are also seeking waiver of pre-deposit in respect of penalties imposed on th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f trading. The Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Rs. 58,15,019/- and also imposed equal amount of penalty on the RUL. Penalties have also been imposed on other appellants. 3. The learned Advocate appearing for the applicant submits that demand has been confirmed against RUL in respect of goods purchased by them from six trader. He submits that M/s New General Trading Company was register....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... dealers were in existence and Commissioner's finding that these firms were non-existent is not sustainable. The Appellants have a strong prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit. 4. The learned DR appearing for the Revenue submits that the Department tried to serve the summons on the traders but summons could not be served. Even the jurisdictional officers could not find these premises on th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aining four traders, we find that the appellant-RUL has not submitted any assessment order of Sales-tax/VAT Authority of respective State. Moreover, report dated 28th May, 2007 sent by Joint Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Faridabad does not incorporate the names of M/s Goverdhan Sales Agency and M/s S.S. Traders as their registered assesses. Similarly, registration of M/s New General Company wa....