<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 462 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit for some traders based on submitted assessment orders and registration details. However, lack of evidence regarding registration and existence of other traders led to a different conclusion. The judgment directed the main party to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs within a specified timeframe for certain traders, with a stay of recovery for the balance amount pending compliance with assessment orders of Sales-tax/VAT Authority. Compliance with assessment orders was crucial in determining the necessity of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in the case involving alleged clandestine clearance of excisable goods without duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 07:43:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 462 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit for some traders based on submitted assessment orders and registration details. However, lack of evidence regarding registration and existence of other traders led to a different conclusion. The judgment directed the main party to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 15 lakhs within a specified timeframe for certain traders, with a stay of recovery for the balance amount pending compliance with assessment orders of Sales-tax/VAT Authority. Compliance with assessment orders was crucial in determining the necessity of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in the case involving alleged clandestine clearance of excisable goods without duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>