Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (8) TMI 358

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Thakur; These five COD applications were filed by M/s. Wireless Communications, Shri Kalpesh Damani, Shri Rakesh Jain, Shri Jaywant Thakar and Shri Nimesh Shah. 2. The reasons given in the applications are that they did not receive order in original at the given address. Shri A.M. Sachwani, learned advocate on behalf of the all the applicants relied upon a letter dated 19.11.2012 written by Su....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arch Centre, Mumbai were produced to the effect that Shri Gunti Bhaskar Babu was undergoing treatment. Appellant also relied upon the following decisions:- (a) M/s. Allianz Steel Limited 2012 (280) ELT 462 (Tri. Del.) (b) M/s. Ashok & Co. Pan Bahar Limited 2012 (286) ELT 635 (Tri. Del.) 4. On the other hand, learned A.R. argued that the reasons given by the appellants for delay are very sketchy....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bsp; 10229/13   26.11.2012   01.01.2013   (iv)   Shri Nimesh Shah 16.4.12   10231/13   26.11.2012   01.01.2013   (v)   Shri Kalpesh Damani 16.4.12   10237/13   12.07.2012   22.11.2012   It is observed that for serial No. (ii) to (iv), the orders in original sent at the known postal address, were returned ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r in original sent to known postal address of M/s. Wireless Communications was not returned undelivered. The address of M/s. Wireless Communications, B-15, Almeda Compound, Near Pratiksha Nagar, Sion Koliwada, Sion, Mumbai is the same what is mentioned in the COD application. Therefore, there is no reason to accept that order in original dated 30.3.2012 was not received by M/s. Wireless Communicat....