<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (8) TMI 358 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application filed by M/s. Wireless Communications due to insufficient medical reasons and inapplicability of cited case laws. Consequently, the stay petition and appeal were dismissed for being time-barred. The importance of providing valid justifications for delay condonation in legal proceedings was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:58:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=198473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (8) TMI 358 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the condonation of delay application filed by M/s. Wireless Communications due to insufficient medical reasons and inapplicability of cited case laws. Consequently, the stay petition and appeal were dismissed for being time-barred. The importance of providing valid justifications for delay condonation in legal proceedings was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=236063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>