Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (4) TMI 486

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... JUDGMENT:- 1. In this appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2007-08, following reframed questions of law have been proposed for our consideration. "(a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that comparable selected by the TPO were not functionally comparable while determining ALP ? (b) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee was not accepted. The Tribunal by the impugned order held that the eight comparables other than M/s. IDC (India) Limited were not functionally comparable with the respondent and, therefore, could not be relied upon. The counsel for the Revenue states that for the subsequent assessment years, assessing officer has found that the eight comparables selected by the TPO were not functionally comp....