<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (4) TMI 486 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227254</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal in a Transfer Pricing case concerning the determination of Arms Length Price (ALP) for investment advisory services. The Tribunal rejected eight additional comparables relied upon by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO), deeming them not functionally comparable with the respondent. Consequently, the Court upheld the respondent&#039;s ALP determination, as the difference in operating margins fell within the acceptable range. The Court declined to address the issue of a safe harbor margin, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (4) TMI 486 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227254</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal in a Transfer Pricing case concerning the determination of Arms Length Price (ALP) for investment advisory services. The Tribunal rejected eight additional comparables relied upon by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO), deeming them not functionally comparable with the respondent. Consequently, the Court upheld the respondent&#039;s ALP determination, as the difference in operating margins fell within the acceptable range. The Court declined to address the issue of a safe harbor margin, ultimately dismissing the appeal with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=227254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>