2013 (1) TMI 196

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....& nodal CPIO, for the Respondent (Heard on telephone). [Order]. -  Appellant has filed first appeal dated 15th June 2012, diarized in the Commission on 18th June 2012, against response of CPIO dated 5th June 2012, on RTI application dated 25th April 2012, diarized in the Commission on the same date. 2. Appeal was fixed for hearing on 10th July 2012 at 11.00 a.m. The Appellant, S....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ng less or anything more than what is admissible as per the Rules. The CPIO returned the IPO of Rs. 20/- to the appellant. 4. Aggrieved, the appellant has filed first appeal stating that order of the CPIO is incorrect and illegal and has erred in taking too technical view of the matter in rejecting the payment of the appellant tendered through postal order. Returning the postal order, to t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e amount has to be exact, neither short nor excess is permitted. The appellant argued that the option of making a payment by a particular mode is available with appellant. He had paid by IPO and himself offered waiver of excess payment of Rs. 2/-. He did not make a lump sum payment. He further argued that making payment through an IPO is a practical method and cost efficient. The appellant once ag....