TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2013 (1) TMI 196
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rd on telephone). [Order]. - Appellant has filed first appeal dated 15th June 2012, diarized in the Commission on 18th June 2012, against response of CPIO dated 5th June 2012, on RTI application dated 25th April 2012, diarized in the Commission on the same date. 2. Appeal was fixed for hearing on 10th July 2012 at 11.00 a.m. The Appellant, Shri R.K. Jain was present, while Shri Panka....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ble as per the Rules. The CPIO returned the IPO of Rs. 20/- to the appellant. 4. Aggrieved, the appellant has filed first appeal stating that order of the CPIO is incorrect and illegal and has erred in taking too technical view of the matter in rejecting the payment of the appellant tendered through postal order. Returning the postal order, to the appellant has already cost the exchequer pos....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s is permitted. The appellant argued that the option of making a payment by a particular mode is available with appellant. He had paid by IPO and himself offered waiver of excess payment of Rs. 2/-. He did not make a lump sum payment. He further argued that making payment through an IPO is a practical method and cost efficient. The appellant once again argued that information should be provided. ....