<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 196 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220090</link>
    <description>The Commission directed the CPIO to provide the information to the appellant within 5 working days upon receipt of the payment by the appellant, accepting the postal order of Rs. 20. The judgment interpreted the RTI Act to promote information dissemination, addressed the legality of rejecting payment through a postal order, and considered practical payment methods under the RTI Fee and Cost Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 196 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220090</link>
      <description>The Commission directed the CPIO to provide the information to the appellant within 5 working days upon receipt of the payment by the appellant, accepting the postal order of Rs. 20. The judgment interpreted the RTI Act to promote information dissemination, addressed the legality of rejecting payment through a postal order, and considered practical payment methods under the RTI Fee and Cost Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=220090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>