2012 (12) TMI 881
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ER SRI. SHAIJRAJ JUDGMENT The petitioner was a dealer under the KGST Act. A consignment was detained and thereupon for its release, the petitioner had to furnish a security deposit of Rs.20,300/-. Enquiry under Section 29A of the KGST Act was completed and finally Ext.P1 order was passed, holding that there was no irregularity warranting the detention and furnishi....
TaxTMI