<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 881 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219866</link>
    <description>Refund of a security deposit furnished to secure release of a detained consignment was warranted where an earlier Section 29A inquiry under the KGST Act found no irregularity in the detention and directed refund of the amount. The remaining question was whether that earlier order had attained finality and whether any other liability survived against the petitioner. On that basis, the refund was made conditional on the earlier order having become final and no outstanding liability remaining against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=193236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 881 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219866</link>
      <description>Refund of a security deposit furnished to secure release of a detained consignment was warranted where an earlier Section 29A inquiry under the KGST Act found no irregularity in the detention and directed refund of the amount. The remaining question was whether that earlier order had attained finality and whether any other liability survived against the petitioner. On that basis, the refund was made conditional on the earlier order having become final and no outstanding liability remaining against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>