2012 (12) TMI 392

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HAI ENDLAW, J 1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 2nd February, 2012 of the learned Company Judge of this Court in an appeal (Co. A.(SB) 74/2011) under Section10F of the Companies Act, 1956 against the order dated 9th September, 2011 of the Company Law Board dismissing the application of the appellant under Section 111A of the Act for rectification of the Share Register. This ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....voked. 4. The counsel for the appellant has today drawn our attention to:- (i). Prakash Timbers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sushma Shingla AIR 1996 Allahabad 262 (DB); and, (ii). Maharashtra Power Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. Dabhol Power Co. AIR 2004 Bombay 38 (DB). What we however find is that the Allahabad High Court had held such intra court appeal to be maintainable under Rule 5 of Cha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t order of a Single Judge to a Division Bench. 6. The counsel for the respondent appearing on advance notice has also invited our attention to the judgment dated 20th October, 2008 of the Full Bench of this Court in LPA No.198/2008 titled Avtar Narain Behal Vs. Subhash Chander Behal, also laying down that after the insertion of Section 100A in CPC, no Letters Patent Appeal is maintainable again....