https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219377 An appeal against a Single Judge's order in an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 was held not maintainable. Section 483 was confined to appeals from orders or decisions made in winding-up matters and therefore did not support further appellate review in this context. The settled position noted by the Court was that, after Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 came into force, no further appeal lies from an order passed in a Section 10F appeal. The Court also relied on the Full Bench view that a Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable against a Single Judge's judgment in a first appeal under a special enactment. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:36:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219377 An appeal against a Single Judge's order in an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 was held not maintainable. Section 483 was confined to appeals from orders or decisions made in winding-up matters and therefore did not support further appellate review in this context. The settled position noted by the Court was that, after Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 came into force, no further appeal lies from an order passed in a Section 10F appeal. The Court also relied on the Full Bench view that a Letters Patent Appeal is not maintainable against a Single Judge's judgment in a first appeal under a special enactment. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219377