2012 (11) TMI 611

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nbsp; Bharat Raichandani for the Appellant. V.K. Agarwal for the Respondent. ORDER Ashok Jindal, Judicial Member - The appellants are in appeal along with a stay application against the confirmation of demand under Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service (ECIS) under Section 65 of the Finance Act. 2. The facts of the case are that during the course of scrutiny of the records....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ort Agency Services. Aggrieved by the impugned order, the appellants are before us. 3. After hearing both sides in detail, we find that the appeal itself can be disposed. Therefore, after granting waiver of pre-deposit, we take up the appeal itself for final disposal. 4. The learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the activities undertaken by them is not covered under the ECIS as hel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vered under impugned service - Sections 65(39a) and 73 of Finance Act, 1994." Therefore, the demand on account of Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services is not sustainable. He further submitted that the demand on account of GTA services is confirmed against them without giving them abatement as per Notification No. 32/2004 wherein the appellants are entitled for seventy five per cent aba....