https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218596 The Tribunal set aside the demand under Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service (ECIS) for activities related to sewerage and water supply pipeline construction, determining they did not qualify as ECIS. The appellants were granted seventy-five percent abatement for Goods Transport Agency Services under Notification No. 32/2004, with a requirement to pay any discrepancies in demand computation within a specified timeframe. The appeal against the ECIS demand was allowed, and the appellants' entitlement to abatement for GTA services was upheld. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218596 The Tribunal set aside the demand under Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service (ECIS) for activities related to sewerage and water supply pipeline construction, determining they did not qualify as ECIS. The appellants were granted seventy-five percent abatement for Goods Transport Agency Services under Notification No. 32/2004, with a requirement to pay any discrepancies in demand computation within a specified timeframe. The appeal against the ECIS demand was allowed, and the appellants' entitlement to abatement for GTA services was upheld. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=218596