Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (8) TMI 731

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the appellant Per: Mr. Sahab Singh, This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the Order-in-Appeal no. PII/BKS/366/03 dated 17.12.2003. 2. The brief facts of the case are that D.B. Technologies P. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) are manufacturers of UPS Systems falling under Chapter 85 of the Central Excise Tariff. The respondent have cleared the UPS system along ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of electricity.  UPS system becomes useful when the supply from the mains fails and then the electricity storage battery is used as an alternative for the mains. Thus the battery supply with the UPS system is an integral part of the UPS system. He therefore argued that the cost of batteries is required to be added in the assessable value to charging the duty. He relied upon the various decisi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aining to their Pune unit order of Commissioner dropping the demand has been set aside by the CEGAT." It is clear that in their own case CEGAT has set aside the order passed by the Commissioner dropping the demand on own account of value of bought out items.  There is nothing on record that the respondent has challenged the order of CEGAT.  We do not find any reasoning given by the Co....