<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 731 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210579</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the cost of batteries in the assessable value of UPS systems for charging duty based on precedent and legal arguments. Additionally, the demand for duty for a specific period was found to be time-barred due to the absence of evidence of misrepresentation or suppression of facts. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 731 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210579</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of the cost of batteries in the assessable value of UPS systems for charging duty based on precedent and legal arguments. Additionally, the demand for duty for a specific period was found to be time-barred due to the absence of evidence of misrepresentation or suppression of facts. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>