2011 (6) TMI 430

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellants Ms. Sukriti Das and Shri Mayank Garg, Advocate for the Respondent         Per M. Veeraiyan: 1. Heard both sides. Vide Order in original No. 22/demand/2006 dated 27.10.09, the original authority confirmed the demand of Rs.4,99,118/- along with interest and imposed penalty of Rs.5000/- under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. 2. The part....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....PPL/Alld/07 dated 25.10.07 rejected the departmental appeal after taking note of the fact that the order of the original authority already stands set aside and order of the original authority stands merged with the earlier order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 31.1.07. 4. I find that the order of the original authority demanding duty along with interest and imposing penalty of Rs.5,000/- st....