<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 430 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the original authority. The department&#039;s appeal seeking enhancement of the penalty under a different provision was rejected, as the original authority&#039;s order had already been nullified. The Tribunal concluded that there was no valid basis for further challenging the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling, ultimately disposing of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 430 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to set aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the original authority. The department&#039;s appeal seeking enhancement of the penalty under a different provision was rejected, as the original authority&#039;s order had already been nullified. The Tribunal concluded that there was no valid basis for further challenging the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling, ultimately disposing of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>