2011 (4) TMI 1195
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....deparkar: Heard the learned Advocate for the appellants and the Joint CDR for the respondent. 2. These appeals arise from the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby appeals were dismissed solely on the ground that the appellants did not comply with the order regarding the requirement of pre-deposit. 3. The appellants had preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) against the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....od both the appeals came to be dismissed by the impugned order. 4. When the matter came up for hearing before the Tribunal while disposing the stay application, the Tribunal directed the appellants to deposit 50% of the duty amount. Undisputedly, the said amount has been deposited by the appellants. 5. It appears that the controversy which is sought to be raised by the appellants in the ma....