https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209860 The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of appeals due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order after the appellants deposited 50% of the duty amount. The dispute over duty liability of predecessor owners was remanded for further consideration as significant legal and factual questions were raised. The Tribunal clarified that its decision was solely for the pre-deposit issue and instructed the Commissioner to consider the deposit as meeting legal requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when deciding the appeal on its merits. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209860 The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of appeals due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order after the appellants deposited 50% of the duty amount. The dispute over duty liability of predecessor owners was remanded for further consideration as significant legal and factual questions were raised. The Tribunal clarified that its decision was solely for the pre-deposit issue and instructed the Commissioner to consider the deposit as meeting legal requirements under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when deciding the appeal on its merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209860