2011 (3) TMI 949

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rep. by Sh. S.K. Panda, Jt. CDR for the respondent. Per: Shri Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar: Heard the learned Advocate for the appellants and Jt. CDR for the respondent. 2. This appeal is being heard in terms of order passed today in the stay applications No. 3011 of 2010. 3. Learned Advocate placed on record the statement to the effect that the appellants had already deposited a sum....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unt, consequently, the appeal itself was dismissed. 5. It is sought to be canvassed on behalf of the appellants that certainly there was lapse on the part of the appellants in the sense that they have failed to file the required application for waiver of the requirement of pre-deposit. However, in view of deposit of sum of Rs. 2 lakhs already made by the appellants, it is the contention on beha....