https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208610 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellants' failure to deposit the required amount as directed. However, after acknowledging their error and depositing a substantial portion of the sum, the Tribunal found the compliance sufficient under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a decision on the merits, allowing the appeal without expressing an opinion on the case's substance. en-us Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208610 The appeal was dismissed due to the appellants' failure to deposit the required amount as directed. However, after acknowledging their error and depositing a substantial portion of the sum, the Tribunal found the compliance sufficient under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a decision on the merits, allowing the appeal without expressing an opinion on the case's substance. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208610