2010 (3) TMI 814

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....]. - The petitioner challenging the order of the first respondent dated 3-3-2010 [2010 (18) S.T.R. 305 (Tri. - Chennai)], wherein the Tribunal directed the petitioner to deposit entire demanded amount by way of pre-deposit for entertaining the appeal. 2. A perusal of the order passed by the first respondent shows that the petitioner had not shown any financial difficulties that stand in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titioner for sale of materials is outside the purview of Section 11D as per the ratio of the judgment reported in 2008 (222) E.L.T. 216 (Tri.) - Bikash Industries, 2007 (220) E.L.T. 520 (Tri.) = 2009 (15) S.T.R. 640 (Tribunal) - SAIL Bansal Service Centre and 2008 (221) E.L.T. 583 (Tri.) - Ascent Laboratories the first respondent directed the petitioner to make the payment of the entire demanded a....