<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 814 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208241</link>
    <description>The Court interfered with a Tribunal order requiring deposit of the entire disputed amount as a condition for entertaining the appeal. It noted that the petitioner had not established financial difficulty, but for the limited purpose of pre-deposit a prima facie case was made out, and that consideration had to be balanced against the Revenue&#039;s interest. The pre-deposit condition was therefore modified: the petitioner was directed to deposit 50% of the disputed amount, and the balance was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 814 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208241</link>
      <description>The Court interfered with a Tribunal order requiring deposit of the entire disputed amount as a condition for entertaining the appeal. It noted that the petitioner had not established financial difficulty, but for the limited purpose of pre-deposit a prima facie case was made out, and that consideration had to be balanced against the Revenue&#039;s interest. The pre-deposit condition was therefore modified: the petitioner was directed to deposit 50% of the disputed amount, and the balance was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>