Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (10) TMI 23

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Appellant   Goolam E. Vahanvati, AG and B.V. Balaram Das, Adv., for the Respondent   JUDGEMENT   Delay condoned.   Leave granted.   The appellant is an individual. He is a partner in M/s. Mahajan Exports, Panipat, and M/s. Maspar, Panipat. He derives business income, income from salary and income from house property. A search was conducted under Sect....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Assessing Officer under Section 158BC of the Act was set aside by Commissioner of Income under Section 263 of the Act with a direction to make the assessment de novo on the points enumerated in Synopsis 'C' to the special leave petition. This Order of Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Act was set aside by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ['ITAT', for short] observing that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nch of the High Court, particularly when, by the impugned judgement, the High Court has over-ruled the decision of ITAT. Since statutory appeal lies to the High Court under Section 260A of the Act, the High Court ought to have given it's findings in detail, particularly on the question whether there was any error of law in the decision of ITAT and whether that error caused prejudice to the Revenue....