<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206640</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment due to the lack of opportunity for the appellant to be heard. Emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to present arguments, the Court directed a fresh consideration by the High Court, solely based on the procedural aspect of providing a fair opportunity for the appellant to argue the case. The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of detailed reasoning when overruling a lower tribunal&#039;s decision and stressed the necessity for the High Court to provide findings on any alleged error of law causing prejudice to the Revenue. The case was remitted for a new hearing without expressing any opinion on the merits or awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=180126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 23 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206640</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment due to the lack of opportunity for the appellant to be heard. Emphasizing the appellant&#039;s right to present arguments, the Court directed a fresh consideration by the High Court, solely based on the procedural aspect of providing a fair opportunity for the appellant to argue the case. The Supreme Court highlighted the importance of detailed reasoning when overruling a lower tribunal&#039;s decision and stressed the necessity for the High Court to provide findings on any alleged error of law causing prejudice to the Revenue. The case was remitted for a new hearing without expressing any opinion on the merits or awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=206640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>