Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (3) TMI 385

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....DR, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar, President]. -  Heard the DR for the appellant. None present for the respondent though served. 2. This appeal arises from order dated 31-7-2003 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Mumbai whereby the appeal filed by the respondents  against the order of the adjudicating authority w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd consequently they received insurance amount of Rs. 30,91,171/-. The respondents disposed of damaged finished goods as scrap and paid excise duty accordingly thereon. A show cause notice dated 8th December, 1999 came to be issued which was contested by the respondents under their reply dated 31-12-1999. 4. It was a case of the department that since insurance claim received by the respond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e company in relation to the damaged goods, they had also incurred expenses for rectification and repairs of part of the damaged goods and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case the contention of the department was not justified. 5. All said done, the fact remains that the department has not been able to establish that the compensation received from the insurance....