Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether insurance compensation received for flood-damaged goods was liable to be treated as additional consideration forming part of the normal price for valuation under excise law.
Analysis: The compensation received from the insurer was in relation to damage suffered by the goods and not shown to be part of the sale price of the goods ultimately cleared and disposed of. The department failed to establish any nexus between the insurance receipt and the assessable value of the goods. The mere receipt of compensation for loss or damage could not, on these facts, be treated as an element of the price for excise valuation.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee; the insurance amount was not includible as additional consideration in the assessable value.