2010 (9) TMI 669
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sp;These appeals under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") are against the order of the Tribunal dated 19-6-2008 [2009 (237) E.L.T. 674 (Tri. - Del.)], by which the Tribunal has allowed the appeals of the respondents and quashed the order passed by the adjudicating authority. 2. The Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were involved in the manufacturing o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s filed their reply. The Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I, vide its order dated 30-7-2007 has confirmed the demand against the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and also imposed the penalty on the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and on other respondents alleged to have been involved in the clandestine removal of the goods. 3. Being aggrieved by the impugned orders, the respondents filed appeals befo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the consumption norms of electricity for producing on MT of steel ingots. Tribunal also observed that the electricity consumption varies from one heat to another and from one date to another and even from one heat to another within the same date. Therefore, no universal and uniformly acceptable standard of electricity consumption can be adopted for determining the excise duty liability that too o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tion by the appellants, as was repeatedly requested by them. In the absence of the same, the statements of the share brokers etc. cannot be relied upon. The Tribunal further observed that even if, for the sake of argument, it is accepted that the income shown in the balance sheets is not the income derived form the sources declared by the appellants, there is nothing on record to link it with the ....
TaxTMI