Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (4) TMI 88

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant.   ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J.   1. This appeal has been preferred by the revenue under Section 27A of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (for short, "the Act") against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi dated 1.9.2009 in WTA No.06/Del/09 for the assessment year 2000-01 claiming following substantial questions of law:-   "(i) Whether on the facts and in the circu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g its order for the earlier assessment year. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the department on the ground of smallness of the amount involved. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant.   4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the monetary limit for filing appeal was not applicable to wealth tax cases and in any case, on the date of filing of appeal before the T....