<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 88 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203338</link>
    <description>The Court interpreted Section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act regarding urban land inclusion as an asset. It addressed the monetary limit for wealth tax appeals, resolving conflicts on the relevant date for the limit. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order due to conflicting judgments and remanded for a fresh decision based on the amount involved. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was unsustainable, granting the assessee liberty to appeal if dissatisfied, ultimately disposing of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 08:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 88 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203338</link>
      <description>The Court interpreted Section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act regarding urban land inclusion as an asset. It addressed the monetary limit for wealth tax appeals, resolving conflicts on the relevant date for the limit. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order due to conflicting judgments and remanded for a fresh decision based on the amount involved. The Court concluded that the Tribunal&#039;s decision was unsustainable, granting the assessee liberty to appeal if dissatisfied, ultimately disposing of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>