2009 (3) TMI 598
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Respondent. JUDGMENT 1. The question of law as raised in this appeal is as under: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the difference in amount between commercial price and published price is special commission in the nature of commission or brokerage within the meaning of Explanation (i) to section 194H of the Income-tax Act 1961 ?" 2. It is not i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....DS is deductible on this amount under section 194H of the Income-tax Act. 3. On a perusal of the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, we find that it proceeded on the basis of its earlier decision in the case of Korean Air v. Deputy CIT in which, in similar circumstances, it was held that TDS was not deductible. He finds that though an appeal was preferred against the aforesaid decision ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....iscretion to sell the tickets at any rate between the fixed minimum commercial price and the published price and it would be impracticable and unreasonable to expect the assessee to get a feed back from their numerous agents in respect of each ticket sold. Further, if the airlines have discretion to sell the tickets at the price lower than the published price then the permission granted to the age....
TaxTMI