<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 598 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203194</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the difference in pricing between the commercial and published prices did not amount to commission or brokerage under section 194H of the Income-tax Act 1961. The Court held that the income paid out must be ascertainable in the hands of the assessee for TDS to be applicable, and the discretion given to agents in pricing did not constitute commission. Therefore, any additional amount earned by the agent above the fixed minimum commercial price was taxable in the agent&#039;s hands, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=176760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 598 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203194</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the difference in pricing between the commercial and published prices did not amount to commission or brokerage under section 194H of the Income-tax Act 1961. The Court held that the income paid out must be ascertainable in the hands of the assessee for TDS to be applicable, and the discretion given to agents in pricing did not constitute commission. Therefore, any additional amount earned by the agent above the fixed minimum commercial price was taxable in the agent&#039;s hands, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>