Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (10) TMI 173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Sisupal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. The appellants imported the impugned goods namely "Rovimix Stay - C 35" claiming the same to be "Ascorbyl Polyphosphate" claiming the concessional duty under Notification No. 23/98 (Sl. No. 18 - List I - Item 3). The impugned goods were assessed provisionally and the samples were sen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hat the Chemical Examiner's report does not come anywhere near identifying the compound by name and that the denial of the concessional rate of duty on the strength of such expert opinion was prima facie not sustainable. 4. In the absence of any definite chemical test result to the contrary, we have looked at the product literature submitted by the appellants as well as the submission made b....