Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods were correctly identified as Ascorbyl Polyphosphate so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 23/98.
Analysis: The chemical examiner's report was inconclusive and did not definitively identify the product by name. In the absence of a conclusive test result, the description in the product literature was relied upon. That literature showed the product as sodium calcium ascorbyl-2-phosphate, with synonyms and composition consistent with ascorbyl polyphosphate. The contemporaneous product data and supporting literature also described the goods in terms consistent with the exemption entry.
Conclusion: The imported goods were held to be Ascorbyl Polyphosphate covered by the notification, and the appellants were held entitled to exemption.
Final Conclusion: The denial of concessional duty was set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a conclusive chemical test is absent, product literature and contemporaneous description may establish that imported goods answer the exemption entry under the notification.