Tribunal grants duty exemption for imported goods under Notification No. 23/98, overturning Chemical Examiner's report.

The Tribunal concluded that the imported goods were indeed Ascorbyl Polyphosphate as specified under Notification No. 23/98, entitling the appellants to exemption. The denial of concessional duty based on the Chemical Examiner's report was deemed unfounded as the product literature provided by the appellants supported their claim. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders denying concessional duty, allowed the appeal, and granted consequential benefits to the appellants.

---

---

Issues:
Interpretation of the imported goods for concessional duty under Notification No. 23/98.
Validity of denying concessional duty based on Chemical Examiner's report.
Determining the nature of the imported goods based on product literature.
Entitlement of the appellants to exemption under the impugned Notification.

Analysis:
The case involved the appellants importing goods claimed to be "Ascorbyl Polyphosphate" to avail concessional duty under Notification No. 23/98. The goods were provisionally assessed, and samples were sent for testing. The Chemical Examiner's report initially stated the sample was inconclusive but later opined it was a mixture of Sodium/Calcium salt of Ascorbyl Phosphate. The denial of concessional duty based on this expert opinion led to the appeal.

The Tribunal noted that the Chemical Examiner's report did not conclusively identify the compound by name, questioning the basis for denying concessional duty. In the absence of definitive chemical test results, the Tribunal examined the product literature submitted by the appellants and the submissions made by the authorities. The literature described the product as Sodium, calcium ascorbyl-2-phosphate, with synonyms like L-ascorbic acid phosphate and vitamin C phosphate. It highlighted the esterification of ascorbic acid to protect vitamin C and the composition primarily being the monophosphate ester of L-ascorbic acid.

Based on the detailed descriptions in the product literature, the Tribunal concluded that the imported goods were indeed Ascorbyl Polyphosphate as specified under List-I, Item No. 3 against Sl. No. 18 of Notification No. 23/98. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to exemption under the impugned Notification. Therefore, the impugned orders denying concessional duty were set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellants. The operative portion of the order was pronounced in open court upon completion of the hearing.

---