2011 (2) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the respondents   Per: Dr. Chittarajan Satapathy,   Heard both sides.   2. Initially on 04.11.09 with the consent of both sides, all the four appeals were remanded with the direction to decide the cases afresh after taking into account the decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of W.P.I.L. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Meerut 2005 (181)ELT 359 (SC). Subsequently, the department....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the department has taken no other ground in the application for ROM, those two appeals may be allowed by way of remand for fresh decision in the light of the cited judgment of the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of W.P.I.L. Ltd.(supra).   4. We have heard the Ld. DR, who has no objection to the course of action suggested by the Ld. Advocate. Accordingly, we reject the appeal Nos. E/539 &....