<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 17 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of refund claims as time-barred in appeals E/539 &amp;amp; 540/03. A rectification application was allowed for no finding on the time bar issue, leading to fresh decisions. Appeals E/549 &amp;amp; 550/03 were remanded based on a Supreme Court judgment, directing reconsideration without time bar issues. The case highlights the Tribunal&#039;s handling of time-barred refund claims, the importance of recording findings, and the influence of Supreme Court decisions on remanded cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=175917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 17 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of refund claims as time-barred in appeals E/539 &amp;amp; 540/03. A rectification application was allowed for no finding on the time bar issue, leading to fresh decisions. Appeals E/549 &amp;amp; 550/03 were remanded based on a Supreme Court judgment, directing reconsideration without time bar issues. The case highlights the Tribunal&#039;s handling of time-barred refund claims, the importance of recording findings, and the influence of Supreme Court decisions on remanded cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=202329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>